Disunion Feed

The Sun @BaltimoreSun · Baltimore, Md.

Bad enough that the Senate became a theatre of venomous invective — in which, it must be conceded, Mr. Sumner is one of the adepts. But it is a humiliation, an offence to the whole country, that its sanctity should be so ruthlessly violated by the scene Mr. Brooks enacted.

Original passage & context
"It was bad enough that that hall should have been permitted to become the theatre of venomous invective and personal defamation between members, and that the tone of the public discussions there held should have been so lowered as we find them of late, (and in which, it must be conceded, Mr. Sumner appears as one of the adepts;) but it is indeed a humiliation and a degradation -- an offence, too, as it were to the whole country -- that its sanctity should have been so ruthlessly violated by such a scene as that enacted by Mr. Brooks."

Border-state moderate voice: one sentence performing the whole blame-distribution move — Sumner an 'adept' of invective in a parenthetical, Brooks's act the greater violation of the chamber's sanctity.

Boston Post @BostonPost · Boston

The bitter tirade, the wanton vituperation, the absolute vulgarity poured forth for two days by Charles Sumner ought not to be countenanced. The affair was disgraceful and we condemn it — but not even the slander of an absent and aged relative affords sufficient apology.

Original passage & context
"But surely the bitter tirade of personality, the wanton vituperation of high personal character, the absolute vulgarity of language, poured forth for two days by Charles Sumner ought not to be countenanced by those who would respect the dignity of the senate or the honor of the country. [...] The affair was disgraceful and we lament and condemn it; and not even the slander of an absent and aged relative or libel on his native state, affords sufficient apology to the assaulter."

New England's leading Democratic paper in the both-sides register: condemns the assault in one clause while ratifying its premise in the next — conceding Sumner committed 'slander' and 'libel' even while denying Brooks 'sufficient apology.' Drew a contemporary rebuke from the Pittsburgh Gazette. Fragments joined with [...].

Where this sits

Both of these were printed on May 24, 1856, inside the caning of Charles Sumner — 19 posts, each linked to its primary source.

How this was made