Disunion Feed

America has argued itself to the edge before. The words come from 1854–1861; the arguments are the ones we are still having.

Frederick Douglass @FDouglassApr 1, 1861 · Rochester, N.Y. · original ↗

He reached the Capital as the poor, hunted fugitive slave reaches the North — in disguise, crawling and dodging under the sable wing of night. We have no censure for the President at this point. He only did what braver men have done. His Inaugural is a double-tongued document.

Next post: Indianapolis Daily State Sentinel, Apr 9, 1861 →

The post above is condensed. From the original, word for word
"He reached the Capital as the poor, hunted fugitive slave reaches the North, in disguise, seeking concealment, evading pursuers, by the underground railroad, between two days, not during the sunlight, but crawling and dodging under the sable wing of night. [...] We have no censure for the President at this point. He only did what braver men have done. [...] we must declare the address to be but little better than our worst fears, and vastly below what we had fondly hoped it might be. It is a double-tongued document, capable of two constructions"

Douglass reviews the same inaugural the North and South each read as their own (se-039). He likens the President's night arrival in Washington to a fugitive slave's, then declines to censure it ("He only did what braver men have done"); his censure is for the speech that followed, which says two things at once. Three passages joined with [...]. The scan is rough; OCR line-wraps and artifacts fixed silently in the excerpt are "evad- ing"→"evading", "ad- dress"→"address", "and- vastly"→"and vastly", "wehad"→"we had", "ca- pable"→"capable", "constructiogs"→"constructions". No words added or dropped.

Next post: Indianapolis Daily State Sentinel, Apr 9, 1861 →

Next in order

Between the posts

April 4. Lincoln orders a relief expedition prepared. Two days later he sends word to Governor Pickens at Charleston that provisions — and only provisions — will be landed at Sumter, and that no men or arms will go in unless the ships are fired on.

Indianapolis Daily State Sentinel @IndyStateSentinel · Indianapolis, Ind.

An army of 500,000 men could not conquer the whole South in five years. And if it could? Eight or ten millions of Anglo-Saxons lying exhausted at our feet, with an undying hatred in their hearts. It would no longer be a government of consent, but a military despotism.

Original passage & context
"we may then say that an army of 500,000 men could not conquer the whole South in five years. [...] Simply this: eight or ten millions of Anglo-Saxons, lying exhausted at our feet—with an undying hatred in their hearts against us, ready to rebel again and again on every emergency [...] It would no longer be a government of consent, but a military despotism."

Three days before the first shot, an anti-war Democratic paper does the arithmetic and gets it very nearly right. The Union would enlist roughly 2.1 million men over four years; the war ran from April 1861 to April 1865; federal troops occupied the South until 1877. The paper is arguing against coercion, not forecasting for its own sake — but the estimate stands. Three passages joined with [...].

Where this sits

Post 45 of 54 from the secession winter, Nov 9, 1860 – Apr 13, 1861 — each post linked to its primary source.

Part of 134 verified passages across 5 flashpoints, Jan 6, 1854 – Apr 13, 1861 — read the feed from the start.

How this was made