Disunion Feed

America has argued itself to the edge before. The words come from 1854–1861; the arguments are the ones we are still having.

Charleston Mercury @CharlestonMercuryMar 27, 1857 · Charleston, S.C. · original ↗

They tell us, too, that we shall acquire, by the decision of the Supreme Court, not one right more than they granted us before — not one foot of slave territory more than we would have acquired without it. How much that will be, let the late history of our Government answer.

Next post: Ohio State Journal, Mar 31, 1857 →

The post above is condensed. From the original, word for word
"Poor deluded mortals, they tell us, too, that we shall acquire, by the decision of the Supreme Court, not one right more than they granted to us before -- not one foot of slave territory more than we would have acquired without it. How much that will be, let the late history of our Government answer."

Between the posts · the narrator, not the paper

March 27. The loudest secessionist paper in the South looks again at the victory it claimed ten days ago.

Three weeks on, the most extreme Southern paper in the country turns on the victory it had just claimed. Its argument is that a court opinion changes nothing on the ground, and that the South is being lulled by "Union-savers" into mistaking a paper triumph for security. Written as sustained mock-scripture — the millennium has come, peace reigns, and none of it is real. The line is what the Northern papers "tell us", quoted inside that sarcasm.

Next post: Ohio State Journal, Mar 31, 1857 →

Next in order

Ohio State Journal @OhioStateJournal · Columbus, Ohio

Buchanan's organ says the African slave "is not our neighbor in any one sense of the word." Who made Mr. Buchanan or his mouth-piece a judge or divider of races, and a perverter of Scripture truth? St. Paul: God hath made of one blood all nations of men.

Original passage & context
""Who are those neighbors we are commanded to love as ourselves? [...] Or is it the African slave, who is not our neighbor is any one sense of the word, as applied to the great commandment?" Who made Mr. Buchanan or his mouth-piece, a judge or divider of races, and a perverter of Scripture truth? Its inspiration comes not from above, for St. Paul distinctly declares that "God hath made of one blood all nations of men to dwell on the face of the whole earth,""

The fight moves to scripture. The Washington Union was Buchanan's administration organ; the Journal answers it with Acts 17:26 and sends it to read Matthew 25 and Luke 10. "is any one sense" is the printed text, for "in any one sense."

Northern press · Republican Condensed — not verbatim Verified against the source — see the record
Same day, the other sideFederal Union →

Where this sits

Post 23 of 28 from the Dred Scott decision, Mar 6, 1857 – May 14, 1857 — each post linked to its primary source.

Part of 134 verified passages across 5 flashpoints, Jan 6, 1854 – Apr 13, 1861 — read the feed from the start.

How this was made