Disunion Feed

Justice Benjamin R. Curtis @JusticeCurtisMar 6, 1857 · Supreme Court of the United States

At the ratification of the Articles of Confederation, free native-born men descended from African slaves voted in five States on equal terms with other citizens. When the fixed rules of interpretation are abandoned we have no longer a Constitution.

Original passage & context
"At the time of the ratification of the Articles of Confederation, all free native-born inhabitants of the States of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and North Carolina, though descended from African slaves, were not only citizens of those States, but such of them as had the other necessary qualifications possessed the franchise of electors, on equal terms with other citizens. [...] when a strict interpretation of the Constitution, according to the fixed rules which govern the interpretation of laws, is abandoned, and the theoretical opinions of individuals are allowed to control its meaning, we have no longer a Constitution; we are under the government of individual men"

Curtis answers Taney with the record: Black men voted in five of the ratifying states, which is difficult to square with a claim that they were never meant to be citizens. He resigned from the Court within months — the only justice in its history to leave over a decision. The two fragments are from different parts of the dissent, joined with [...].

Next in order

Albany Evening Journal @AlbanyEvJournal · Albany, N.Y.

WASHINGTON, March 6 — Taney has delivered the Court's opinion in the Dred Scott case. Scott is not a citizen. He was not freed by being carried onto free soil. The Missouri Compromise was passed unconstitutionally. Five of the nine judges are slaveholders.

Original passage & context
"Chief Justice Taney delivered to-day the opinion of the U. S. Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. The points are that Scott is not a citizen; that he was not manumitted by being taken by his master when a slave into the then Territory of Illinois, and that the Missouri Compromise was an act unconstitutionally passed by Congress. [...] Five of the Judges are slaveholders, and two of the other four owe their appointments to their facile ingenuity in making State laws bend to Federal demands in behalf of "the Southern institution.""

The news arrives as a wire dispatch — datelined Washington, March 6 — and the Journal prints the holding and its own verdict on the bench in the same breath. The paper's count of slaveholding justices was accurate: Taney, Wayne, Catron, Daniel and Campbell all owned or had owned slaves.

Where this sits

America has argued itself to the edge before. The words come from 1854–1861; the arguments are the ones we are still having.

One passage from the Dred Scott decision, Mar 6, 1857 – May 14, 1857 — 28 posts, each linked to its primary source.

Part of 134 verified passages across 5 flashpoints, Jan 6, 1854 – Apr 13, 1861 — read the feed from the start.

How this was made