Border-State men who would give up all freemen hold dear for the Union, or else be the tail of the Northern Confederacy, cry "precipitancy." The Cotton States owe it to their citizens to secure themselves now against a calamity Black Republican rule will make more than possible.
Next post: Cleveland Daily Plain Dealer, Dec 21, 1860 →
The post above is condensed. From the original, word for word
"Those in the border Slave States who are willing to give up everything that freemen should hold dear, to maintain the existing Union, and, if that cannot be done, desire to fasten these States on as the tail of the Northern Confederacy, complain bitterly of what they call the precipitancy of the Cotton States [...] The Cotton States [...] owe it to their own citizens and the world to secure themselves now against a calamity which the continued possession of the Federal Government for a few years by the Black Republican, or anti-slavery, party will make more than possible."
A border-state (Kentucky) fire-eater defends South Carolina's "precipitancy" and scorns the conditional Unionists who would make the border South "the tail of the Northern Confederacy." Via the AHA "Sixteen Months to Sumter" reproduction of Dumond's Southern Editorials on Secession.
Read it in the original — Louisville Daily Courier, Dec 20, 1860 ↗