Disunion Feed

America has argued itself to the edge before. The words come from 1854–1861; the arguments are the ones we are still having.

Frederick Douglass @FDouglassDec 1, 1860 · Rochester, N.Y. · original ↗

What has Lincoln's election gained the anti-slavery cause? Not much in itself, but very much in its bearings. The masters of slaves have been masters of the Republic; it has broken their power, and the enchantment by which the threat of disunion ruled Northern politicians.

Next post: Charleston Mercury, Dec 3, 1860 →

Printed the same day: North Carolina Standard →

The post above is condensed. From the original, word for word
"What, then, has been gained to the anti-slavery cause by the election of Mr. Lincoln? Not much, in itself considered, but very much when viewed in the light of its relations and bearings. For fifty years the country has taken the law from the lips of an exacting, haughty and imperious slave oligarchy. The masters of slaves have been masters of the Republic. [...] Lincoln's election has vitiated their authority, and broken their power. It has taught the North its strength, and shown the South its weakness. [...] Hitherto the threat of disunion has been as potent over the politicians of the North, as the cat-o'-nine-tails is over the backs of the slaves. Mr. Lincoln's election breaks this enchantment, dispels this terrible nightmare, and awakes the nation to the consciousness of new powers,"

Douglass concedes Lincoln is no abolitionist yet argues the election shattered the slaveholders' half-century grip on the Republic and broke the 'enchantment' by which disunion threats had cowed the North. Douglass' Monthly was a monthly, so no day is printed; dated to the first of the month. Verified via House Divided (Dickinson College) transcription of the December 1860 issue (primary scan at NYS Historic Newspapers). Fragments joined with [...].

Next post: Charleston Mercury, Dec 3, 1860 →

Next in order

Between the posts

To the fire-eaters of Charleston, the danger now is not the North but delay — the Southern men who counsel waiting for a convention, or for an overt act.

Charleston Mercury @CharlestonMercury · Charleston, S.C.

You see your enemy load his rifle with the declared purpose of taking your life — yet you are to wait, as a wise expedient of defense, until he makes the "overt act" and shoots you. Such is the 'delay' urged on the South: an absurdity only submissionists could propose.

Original passage & context
"Although you see your enemy load his rifle with the declared purpose of taking your life, you are to wait, as a wise expedient of defense, until he makes the "overt act" and shoots you. This is one of those glaring absurdities, which only such daring submissionists as BOTTS and CRITTENDEN are capable of proposing."

The Rhett family's Charleston Mercury — the organ of immediate separate-state secession — rebutting the counsels of 'delay' (wait for Virginia, wait for a Southern convention, wait for an 'overt act'). BOTTS = John Minor Botts (Va. Unionist); CRITTENDEN = John J. Crittenden (Ky., of the Crittenden Compromise), named as the 'submissionists.' Directly answers the cooperationist case of se-007. Text from the AHA "Sixteen Months to Sumter" reproduction of Dumond (transcription); excerpt is contiguous verbatim.

Where this sits

Post 8 of 54 from the secession winter, Nov 9, 1860 – Apr 13, 1861 — each post linked to its primary source.

Part of 134 verified passages across 5 flashpoints, Jan 6, 1854 – Apr 13, 1861 — read the feed from the start.

How this was made