Disunion Feed

America has argued itself to the edge before. The words come from 1854–1861; the arguments are the ones we are still having.

North Carolina Standard @NCStandardDec 1, 1860 · Raleigh, N.C. · original ↗

There is only one evil greater than disunion: the loss of honor and Constitutional right. But our honor is untarnished; our Constitutional rights, so far as the federal government is concerned, untouched. Not now! say non-slaveholder, slaveholder, and friends in the free States.

Next post: Nashville Union and American, Dec 1, 1860 →

Printed the same day: Frederick Douglass →

The post above is condensed. From the original, word for word
"There is only one evil greater than disunion, and that is the loss of honor and Constitutional right. That evil the people of the South will never submit to. [...] But our honor as a people is still untarnished—our Constitutional rights, so far as the federal government is concerned, are still untouched. If the federal government should attempt even to tarnish the one or to deprive us of the other, we for one would be ready to resist, and ready to dissolve the Union without regard to consequences. But not now! — the non-slaveholder says not now! — the slaveholder, whose property civil war would involve in imminent peril, says not now! — millions of our friends in the free States say not now!"

Between the posts · the narrator, not the paper

By December the machinery is moving. South Carolina has called a convention and set the day to elect its delegates. The rest of the South divides three ways: go at once, go only in concert, or not for this cause alone.

William W. Holden's paper, the leading voice of North Carolina conditional Unionism — it would resist actual federal aggression but rejected secession over the mere election of Lincoln, absent an overt act. The Upper-South counterweight to the fire-eaters. Text from the AHA "Sixteen Months to Sumter" reproduction of Dumond (transcription). Fragments joined with [...].

Next post: Nashville Union and American, Dec 1, 1860 →

Next in order

Nashville Union and American @NashvilleUnion · Nashville, Tenn.

Lincoln's election is not a wrong in itself, but the crowning proof that a Northern majority approves the outrages on our rights. He enters a minority President, chosen by an adroit marshaling of sectional hate. The remedy is unity — better the South act as one than divided.

Original passage & context
"This election of LINCOLN is not assumed to be an actual wrong in itself, but only the crowning and authoritative evidence that the series of outrages perpetrated upon our rights meet with the approval of a majority of the Northern people. [...] Unity was never more essential to a people than to the South in our present condition. It is better that we should act with less wisdom, abstractly considered, than that we should be divided in our action."

A pro-Breckinridge Tennessee paper that treats Southern grievance as settled but argues the remedy is a united Southern convention, not separate-state secession — the Middle-South cooperationist position that the Charleston Mercury's 'Delay' (se-009) attacks directly. The 'minority President... marshaling of sectional hate' clause used in the tweet is verbatim from the same article, a few sentences before the excerpt. Text from the AHA "Sixteen Months to Sumter" reproduction of Dumond (transcription). Fragments joined with [...].

Southern press · cooperationist Condensed — not verbatim Verified against the source — see the record
Same day, the other sideFrederick Douglass →

Where this sits

Post 6 of 54 from the secession winter, Nov 9, 1860 – Apr 13, 1861 — each post linked to its primary source.

Part of 134 verified passages across 5 flashpoints, Jan 6, 1854 – Apr 13, 1861 — read the feed from the start.

How this was made