Disunion Feed

America has argued itself to the edge before. The words come from 1854–1861; the arguments are the ones we are still having.

Essex County Anti-Slavery Society @EssexCountyASMar 26, 1854 · Danversport, Mass. · original ↗

Resolved: the slaveholders of the South, led on by Stephen A. Douglas and their base allies at the North, would repeal the Missouri Compromise to open the flood-gates of slavery upon Kansas and Nebraska. More evidence of the Slave Power: it makes promises only to break them.

The post above is condensed. From the original, word for word
"Resolved, That in the efforts of the slaveholders of the South, led on by Stephen A. Douglas and other of their base allies at the North, to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820, for the purpose of opening the flood-gates of slavery upon the vast territories of Kansas, Nebraska and the Northwest, we have another evidence of the unscrupulous and aggressive character of the Slave Power [...] no confidence is to be placed in the assurances of slaveholding despots, as they only make promises to break them, and enter compacts and compromises, to violate them whenever their real or fancied interest shall dictate."

Between the posts · the narrator, not the paper

March 4. The Senate passes the bill 37 to 14, and it goes to the House. Three weeks later, in Massachusetts, a county anti-slavery society meets and answers it with resolutions of its own.

Two months before the bill passed, a county anti-slavery society meets at Danversport, north of Boston. Charles L. Remond, its president, took part in the Sunday meetings, but the paper says these resolutions were "presented by Isaac Osgood, of Danvers" and "unanimously adopted," so the card is bylined to the society. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 had barred slavery from this territory; repealing it is what the Nebraska bill would do. Text from the archive.org scan of The Liberator; the issue OCR breaks "Kansas" across a line.

Next post: Federal Union, Mar 28, 1854 →

Next in order

Federal Union @FederalUnion · Milledgeville, Ga.

Every day it becomes more manifest that the South will be forced to act as a unit when the issue is made up on her right to enter the territories. In the North, Whigs and free-soil Democrats will coalesce; a large portion of the Northern Democratic Party will join with the South.

Original passage & context
"Every day it becomes more and more manifest that the South will be forced to act as a unit when the issue shall be made up on her constitutional right to enter and enjoy the territories of this Union [...] Throughout the North, the Whigs and free-soil Democrats will coalesce. A large portion, indeed, of the body of the Democratic Party at the North will stand firm to the creed they have heretofore held -- they will join with the South in the struggle for Constitutional right."

A Georgia paper forecasting the realignment while the bill is still in the House: Whigs and free-soil Democrats fusing in the North, the South voting as a bloc. It expected a large share of Northern Democrats to hold with the South, which is the half of the prediction that did not hold.

Where this sits

Post 8 of 13 from the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Jan 6, 1854 – May 29, 1854 — each post linked to its primary source.

Part of 139 verified passages across 5 flashpoints, Jan 6, 1854 – Apr 13, 1861 — read the feed from the start.

How this was made